The need for new construction airtightness has been growing for decades, but has been booming in the last 10 years specifically. While airtightness testing is required in some jurisdictions by energy codes, other projects may have a specification requirement or an energy program requirement. In these cases, a whole-building, or partial-building test will occur.

When airtightness testing results in a failing grade, diagnostic testing is typically performed to locate the breaches so they can be repaired. This presentation will help identify how these diagnostic tests are performed along with their pros and cons.

Learning Objectives:

1.  Learn common test methods used for locating air leaks in building enclosures.
2.  Apply the most appropriate diagnostic techniques to specific
3. Adjust testing techniques for environmental conditions
4.  Analyze the test results

Mike Poirier

Mike Poirier is the Vice-President of QED LAB, Inc, an AAMA accredited testing laboratory and field testing agency headquartered in Troutdale, Oregon. QED LAB has tested over 900 buildings for airtightness in both commercial and residential configurations, equating to over 43 million square feet of air barrier and over 3,100 residential units. Mike is a Level 2 certified infrared thermographer and a Level 3 certified blower door testing technician with over 20 years experience in the building science industry. He has tested projects across 12 states in the US, as well as in Mexico and Thailand (Nov 2023), including projects for the US Army Corps of Engineers. Mike was a presenter at the 2023 ABAA Building Enclosure Conference.